<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CCIE, the beginning!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:16:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inter-VRF-Lite routing (1/7) by ajnouri</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/inter-vrf-lite-routing-17/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ajnouri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/inter-vrf-lite-routing-17/#comment-864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re welcome Franck, glad you find it useful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Franck, glad you find it useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inter-VRF-Lite routing (1/7) by MadGeek#&#62;</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/inter-vrf-lite-routing-17/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MadGeek#&#62;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/inter-vrf-lite-routing-17/#comment-863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,
Very efficient approach
Thanks a lot
Franck]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Very efficient approach<br />
Thanks a lot<br />
Franck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 6VPE (IPv6 VPN Provider Edge Router) by eduardo1n</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2012/12/18/6vpe-ipv6-vpn-provider-edge-router/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eduardo1n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/?p=1082#comment-861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for this post, was really good.  I knew how to do this on ipv4, however, I didn&#039;t know the concept was very similar for IPv6.   Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this post, was really good.  I knew how to do this on ipv4, however, I didn&#8217;t know the concept was very similar for IPv6.   Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Differences between STP and RSTP by srinivas senapathi</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/differences-between-stp-and-rstp/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[srinivas senapathi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 05:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/differences-between-stp-and-rstp/#comment-854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice document its very usefull. Thanks a lot..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice document its very usefull. Thanks a lot..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by DuyLinh</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/about/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DuyLinh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 18:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI !
Now i learn CCIE, if you want to learn with me, please contact me : skype : duylinh3103 or yahoo: deity_war
Thanks :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI !<br />
Now i learn CCIE, if you want to learn with me, please contact me : skype : duylinh3103 or yahoo: deity_war<br />
Thanks <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Differences between STP and RSTP by ajnouri</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/differences-between-stp-and-rstp/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ajnouri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 12:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/differences-between-stp-and-rstp/#comment-849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tej,
Your question is legitimate and interesting. The closest analogy I can think about is the following: we can all take different roles in a company: employee, manager, engineer, CIO, CFO... and each one pass through different states (condition cycle) (sleeping, working, resting,...)

Each port can be be elected for one role depending on the topology:
&lt;strong&gt;Roles:&lt;/strong&gt;
Root port 
Designated port. 
Alternate port. 
Backup port.

For a given port to be elected in one of the roles it passes through different states:

&lt;strong&gt;States:&lt;/strong&gt;
Discarding
Learning
Forwarding

Take a look at this animation :

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/spanning_tree1.swf&quot; title=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/spanning_tree1.swf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/spanning_tree1.swf&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;frame 10:&lt;/strong&gt; After the election of a root bridge, each non-root bridges must elect one of its ports as a RP (root-port) the closest to the root bridge.
Then a designated and non-designated port are elected for each segment.
&lt;strong&gt;Frame 12,14,17,18,20:&lt;/strong&gt; designated ports are elected, others are in blocking or forwarding state. During all other frames, BPDU is exchanged and each time a port receives TCN (Topology Change Notification) or enabled it passes through (Discarding, Learning, Forwarding) before stabilizing in a given role.

I hope this clarifies the conceptual difference between states and roles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tej,<br />
Your question is legitimate and interesting. The closest analogy I can think about is the following: we can all take different roles in a company: employee, manager, engineer, CIO, CFO&#8230; and each one pass through different states (condition cycle) (sleeping, working, resting,&#8230;)</p>
<p>Each port can be be elected for one role depending on the topology:<br />
<strong>Roles:</strong><br />
Root port<br />
Designated port.<br />
Alternate port.<br />
Backup port.</p>
<p>For a given port to be elected in one of the roles it passes through different states:</p>
<p><strong>States:</strong><br />
Discarding<br />
Learning<br />
Forwarding</p>
<p>Take a look at this animation :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/spanning_tree1.swf" title="http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/spanning_tree1.swf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/spanning_tree1.swf</a></p>
<p><strong>frame 10:</strong> After the election of a root bridge, each non-root bridges must elect one of its ports as a RP (root-port) the closest to the root bridge.<br />
Then a designated and non-designated port are elected for each segment.<br />
<strong>Frame 12,14,17,18,20:</strong> designated ports are elected, others are in blocking or forwarding state. During all other frames, BPDU is exchanged and each time a port receives TCN (Topology Change Notification) or enabled it passes through (Discarding, Learning, Forwarding) before stabilizing in a given role.</p>
<p>I hope this clarifies the conceptual difference between states and roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Differences between STP and RSTP by Tej</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/differences-between-stp-and-rstp/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tej]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/differences-between-stp-and-rstp/#comment-848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have really a basic question..Please do not mind...What is the difference between port roles and port states... i.e why do we need port states as we already have port roles....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have really a basic question..Please do not mind&#8230;What is the difference between port roles and port states&#8230; i.e why do we need port states as we already have port roles&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OSPF loopback network type by Bhupendra Singh</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/ospf-loopback-network-type/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhupendra Singh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/ospf-loopback-network-type/#comment-835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very good...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inter-VRF-Lite routing (7/7) by ajnouri</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/inter-vrf-lite-routing-77/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ajnouri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/inter-vrf-lite-routing-77/#comment-832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dinesh, thanks and sorry for the late reply.

I believe there is no &quot;stateful&quot; version of NAT NVI, but you still can deploy traditional NAT in each customer VRF with HSRP (which is resumed to the outside as simple gratuitous arp message that will direct the downstream to the active HSRP)

I think the more appropriate design would be &lt;a href=&quot;http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/inter-vrf-lite-routing-57/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Customer VRFs &amp; Common service global RIB + Traditional NAT&quot;&lt;/a&gt; + HSRP deployment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dinesh, thanks and sorry for the late reply.</p>
<p>I believe there is no &#8220;stateful&#8221; version of NAT NVI, but you still can deploy traditional NAT in each customer VRF with HSRP (which is resumed to the outside as simple gratuitous arp message that will direct the downstream to the active HSRP)</p>
<p>I think the more appropriate design would be <a href="http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/inter-vrf-lite-routing-57/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Customer VRFs &amp; Common service global RIB + Traditional NAT&#8221;</a> + HSRP deployment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GRE (Generic Routing Encapsulation) : Point-to-point &amp; multipoint GRE by dIEGO</title>
		<link>http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/gre-generic-routing-encapsulation-point-to-point-multipoint-gre/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dIEGO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/gre-generic-routing-encapsulation-point-to-point-multipoint-gre/#comment-831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi,  IN TUNEL GRE I CAN USE KEEPALIVE, IN MGRE WHAT COMMAND I CAN USE??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,  IN TUNEL GRE I CAN USE KEEPALIVE, IN MGRE WHAT COMMAND I CAN USE??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
